Ir’s so predictable it’s becoming more than insulting. Every time some multi-cultural enricher commits some awful crime against a White British citizen and people get angry at the collapse of our society due to mass-migration, open-borders, Third-world invasion, Starmer and his UK-hating cronies (enthusiastically supported by the BBC and most of the mainstream media) launch their all-out attacks on anyone daring to discuss how and why the latest atrocity happened. Of course, the UK-loathing, UN-adoring, Davos-loving Starmer and his anti-British apparatchiks desperately avoid discussing the reazson for the actual atrocity. Deflection and evasion are the names of the game they play again and again and again and …….
Here’s the excellent New Culture Forum explaining the Starmer ‘shoot the messenger’ deflection tactic:
Here’s a picture of three very famous Welsh people.
They are all particularly known for their distinctive voices and two have definitely sung in Welsh choirs. But can you spot the one most likely to become an Islam-inspired mass murderer? Our politicians and Home Office bureaucrats and police can’t.
Is “Eurabia” more than a conspiracy theory?
The basis for the push to swamp Europe with our friends from our favourite religion is based on the idea that the French, who have always loathed (envied?) the US, were keen to weaken relations with America and instead build closer relations with the Arab countries. This would, of course, elevate France’s position in the world as one of the leaders of the Europe/Arab power block and ensure reliable supplies of oil and gas to Europe.
Wikipedia tells us that those pushing the Eurabia theory claim that Europe: “has surrendered to Islam and is in a state of submission (described as dhimmitude) in which Europe is forced to deny its own culture, stand silently by in the face of Muslim atrocities, accept Muslim immigration, and pay tribute through various types of economic assistance.”
We’re assured that Eurabia is an Islamophobic conspiracy theory and a doomsday scenario in which Europe will be Islamized in the near future. The doomsday scenario involves Muslims forming the majority of Europe’s population by the end of the 21st century, due to immigration and to higher birth-rates. They will then seize control and Islamize the continent.
Of course, the people espousing the Eurabia theory are obviously demented conspiracy theorists. Apart from the beheading of a French teacher, the attempted beheading of Lee Rigby, the recent attempted beheading of a Belfast man, the Southport dance class massacre, the Manchester Arena massacre, the Paris concert massacre, the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the Theo Van Gogh murder, the Pim Fortuyn murder, the London transport bombings, the mass rape of possibly tens of thousands of often underage White British girls, the frequent sexual assaults on British girls and women by our Religion of Peace friends and the fact that White British are now minorities in several of our towns and cities, there is absolutely no evidence that our rulers are imposing their Eurabia fantasies on us.
Am I a “racist” Mr Starmer?
I haven’t been rioting and attacking our useless anti-British police or whatever. But, from the little I understand, just because I’d rather not be stabbed multiple times or be beheaded by a multi-cultural enricher next time I go shopping, according to people like Starmer and the BBC and the UK mainstream media, I must be a racist.
I believe one has to be careful about what one writes or says about an ongoing legal case, especially one involving a multi-cultural enricher. Otherwise one risks a 4.00 am visit from five or six armed members of the Starmer SS police. However, one cannot avoid wondering about the cultural and societal implications of a current case.
From what little I understand, a lady from a multi-culturally enriching community has been accused of taking the bloodstained knife her son used to murder an innocent White teenager and hiding it, reportedly to try to protect her murdering son. I think this raises two possibly interesting issues about today’s rich and diverse British population.
Is it “what any mother would do”?
Apparently one of the good lady’s explanations for trying to protect a murderer was that she only did “what any mother would do“. But is that true? Or would it be more accurate to say that it was “what any mother from a multi-culturally enriching community would do“? Because it’s not obvious to a useless ignorant fool like myself that this what any mother from a White British family would do. In fact I believe there have been cases where White British mothers have informed police of their criminal sons’ behaviour. If this is true, it might suggest that when push comes to shove, when the rubber hits the road, when it comes to the crunch, when the chips are down, our friends from our wonderful multi-culturally enriching communities have a tendency to revert to tribal behaviour showing that their supposed ‘Britishness’ and acceptance of our values are sometimes less than skin deep.
What punishment (if any) will the good lady receive?
The next issue concerns what happens if the good lady in question is judged to be guilty of all sorts of stuff like trying to pervert the course of justice. Will she be dealt with using Starmer’s beloved ‘full force of the law’? Or will she suddenly discover that she has PTSD and ADHD and all sorts of other supposed ‘mental illnesses’ brought on by witnessing her darling son murdering someone? Then will Britain’s world-respected system of two-tier justice kick in and decide that, as the lady is a multi-cultural enricher (and not some loathsome White British citizen writing rapidly-deleted hurty tweets) then it would be unfair to punish her too harshly and so she’ll receive the usual suspended sentence regularly handed to multi-culturally enriching criminals, thugs, rapists and suchlike?
Anyway, I’ll be waiting with bated breath to see how this case pans out.
I don’t watch much TV nowadays. But I have been watching some PBS America programmes. Some of their historical documentaries are complete rubbish, especially those using seemingly endless and often rather dubious ‘historical re-enactments’. But some are really quite good, especially those using real historical footage. One which has impressed me recently was titled “The Impossible Peace”. It traces the events of the twenty years between the end of the First World War and the start of the Second World War showing the inevitability of the Second World War due to the blundering, incompetence, greed, thirst for power and ambitions of the world’s leading politicians.
Of course, it’s easy to have 20/20 vision in hindsight. So perhaps many of the politicians’ mistakes leading the world from the disaster of World War 1 to the disaster of World War 2 weren’t obvious at the time?
That brings us to today’s Britain. I have two propositions:-
our politicians are making mistakes which will lead our once great country to disaster
those mistakes are already glaringly obvious to anyone with even a smidgen of intelligence
The only thing we don’t know is whether Britain’s coming disaster will end (to borrow from T.S. Elliott) with a bang – societal breakdown and civil war – or a whimper – a gradual decline into bankruptcy and irrelevance. But what are already clear are the errors our leaders are currently making which will lead us to the bang or whimper.
The main ones seem to be:
Population replacement: Our rulers seem to believe that anyone in the world has the right to come and live in Britain. On the Left this seems to be linked to an obsession that everything the British Empire did was evil and therefore we should hand over our country to the people we supposedly oppressed. Some estimated suggest that White British will be in a minority within 20 to 30 years. White British are already a minority in several cities and towns. In London just 36.8% are White British. In Birmingham only 42.9%. In Leicester 40.9%. In Slough 34.5%. In Luton 44.6%.
Two-tier government: The White British population can clearly see that they are being discriminated against while supposed minorities seem to get prioritised. For example, an estimated 382,000 British are homeless while illegal Third-world migrants get free 4-star hotels, free clothes, free meals, free money, free new phones. And while many White British struggle to see a doctor or get a dental appointment, illegal migrants get immediate medical and dental care plus a free taxi to take them to their medical or dental appointment. And, of course, we all know about two-tier policing and our two-tier ‘justice’ system which leads to long prison sentences for any White British using hurty words on social media while pro-Palestinian and BLM thugs can scream hatred and riot without any fear of any consequences.
Decriminalisation of crimes committed by minorities: Crimes like shoplifting and gang rape seem to have been decriminalised, especially if committed by people from ethnic minorities. For example, tens of thousands of often underage White girls seem to have been gang-raped by members of a certain community and only about 70 men have ever been prosecuted. Either those 70 or so men must have been very busy raping every hour of every day or else our police, politicians and prosecutors have been desperately trying to look the other way as they didn’t want to ‘create division’ between communities. Perhaps the mass rape of White girls ‘didn’t cross Mr Starmer’s desk’ when he was Director of Public Prosecutions? And, of course, we’re seen Labour fighting tooth and nail to prevent any national inquiry into the mainly Religion of Peace rape gangs.
Politicisation and militarisation of the police: Our police no longer seem interested in fighting crime. They now see their role as focused mainly on oppressing and subjugating an increasingly angry White British population which sees its country being taken away from them and feels they are becoming second- or third-class citizens in their own country.
Crushing free speech: There are far too many examples of this to list here. Father Ted co-creator Graham Linehan was been arrested by armed police at Heathrow Airport on suspicion of inciting violence in relation to his posts on X about men pretending to be women. A three-year prison sentence given to a woman for a rapidly deleted hurty tweet after the Southport slaughter by the ‘Welsh choirboy’. Ordinary people being dragged out of bed in the early morning by 5 or 6 police for something they have written on social media.
Economically-suicidal Net Zero: It seems that almost everyone in the country, except for our politicians, can see that Britain’s ‘legally-binding’ Net Zero policies are giving us the highest energy prices in the developed world, bankrupting our businesses and throwing hundreds of thousands out of work. Everybody, except our politicians, can see that no business can survive and compete when crippled by energy prices which are 3 to 4 times those in the US and at least 5 to 6 times higher than those in other countries which are taking our jobs.
A benefits system with a country attached: About 1,000 people a day are registering as being supposedly long-term sick and unable to work. approximately 300,000 working-age adults fall out of work due to long-term sickness each year. About 2,500,000 people are registered as being too ill to even look for work. You’ve all seen the Pat McFadden quote that every meeting he had with members of the Parliamentary Labour Party concerned the question: “Who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others?” To anyone outside the Labour, LibDems and Greens, it’s clear this situation cannot continue. Bankruptcy is the only possible conclusion.
Of course, there are many more issues than these leading us to our own destruction. But just these glaringly obvious mistakes our politicians are making will clearly lead to disaster. Our country is no longer a country. It’s just a geographical location where many different people live uneasily beside each other with tension very close to the surface. As we get poorer and the government needs to oppress us ever more to keep public fury under control, disaster becomes ever more inevitable. But what we can’t know is whether this disaster will be a bang – societal collapse and civil war – or a whimper – gradual decline into bankruptcy and irrelevance.
It will be interesting to see how it all pans out. And one day maybe PBS America will do a documentary on how Britain’s politicians destroyed their country?
Britain’s greatest and most patriotic prime minister, Mr Starmer, has spoken about the Henry Nowak murder. “Nigel Farage is completely wrong to use this to try and create division,” thundered our great Prime Minister on Tuesday. On Wednesday, in the Commons, MPs shouted and yelled to drown Nigel Farage out as he tried to ask the (IMHO) worthless empty suit Starmer a question about the murder. And all over the media plenty of Labour and Tory and LibDem MPs all piled in with similar ad hominem attacks on Farage. Watching the tsunami of bile aimed at Farage by every grifting, hypocritical establishment crony, you could almost have thought that Farage was the murderer.
I am appalled, upset and angry at the murder of Henry Nowak by a Sikh and his family ably assisted by the useless, UK-hating Hampshire police. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am appalled, upset and angry that the police who hastened Nowak’s death aren’t being prosercuted for manslaughter. Instead one has resigned and the others are still working. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am appalled, upset and angry that the murderer’s family, who seem to have assisted in the murder by lying to the police haven’t been arrested and charged, especially the mother who, it is reported, tried to hide the murder weapon. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am enraged at Starmer’s two-tier policing which tries to protect any criminal who is not British while using the ‘full force of the law’ to crush any White British who criticise the government. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am furious that three multi-cultural-enriching rapists weren’t even given prison sentences when any White British would have ended up spending years behind bars. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am incandescent that Labour councils and Labour-adoring police and a certain well-known Director of Public Prosecutions allowed thousands of White British, often underage girls to be gang raped again and again and again and again by mainly Pakistani Religion of Peace rape gangs. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am fuming that three innocent young girls were slaughtered at a Taylor Swift themed dance class in Southport by a multi-cultural enricher and that the politicians, police and mainstream media tried to cover up the murderer’s identity by claiming he was just a “Welsh choirboy”. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am furious that Labour is destroying the British economy by deliberately taxing companies so they go bankrupt in order to have more money for Labour to spaff on skivers and shirkers and parasites and illegal Third-world migrants and other (IMHO) scum. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am beyond incandescent that our UK-loathing, EU- and UN-adoring excuse for a government is trying to make White British a minority in their own country within the next 20-30 years. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
Hopefully many of you saw the interview with the fragrant Nicola Sturgeon on ‘Red’ Laura Kuenssberg’s Sunday political Labour-loving show. I, of course, believe eveverything the Wee Jimmy Krankie said:
Obviously she wouldn’t have been surprised at the:
Jaguar car which appeared on her driveway
The massive mobile home parked at the side of her 80-year-old parents-in-law’s house
The pens and pepper pots and suchlike costing thousands of pounds
And all the other goodies bought by her husband with embezzled money
After all, she was just a working-class girl from the North of Scotland. So such items would be quite normal in a modest home like hers.
But, just like our world-respected BBC, I have to be impartial and thus must give both sides of every story just like the BBC does on subjects like ‘Global Boiling’ and ‘Safe end Effective Vaccines’ and how wonderful the EU is and what a disaster Brexit was etc etc etc
On 20 November 2014, Nicola Sturgeon became First Minister of Scotland, succeeding Alex Salmond, who had resigned after defeat in the Scottish Independence referenfum. She is the first woman to hold this position. In March 2023, Sturgeon resigned as First Minister and was succeeded by Humza Yousaf. According to Wikipedia, she said that her resignation was because of the emotional toll the role took on her and for the false internet rumours about her sexuality and personal life. But, if I remember correctly, there was a good deal of furore at the time of her resignation about a transgender (male!) Scottish rapist being incarcerated in a women’s prison.
So for balance and impartiality, here’s one of the most scurrilous rumours being spread by horrible people. Such people are suggesting that Scotland’s previous First Lady is a vagitarian who realised that a single woman could never reach the highest position in Scottish politics, especially given the rumours about her personal life. The story goes on to suggest that her 2010 marriage at the age of forty was a sham designed enable her to become First MInister. If this is the case (and I’m sure it’s not) this would have given her ‘husband’ an incredible lever to use against her should she ever find out about his tendency to so generously spend other people’s money on himself and his good lady wife.
According to the Scottish Daily Express, 75% of those who expressed an opinion believe that Sturgeon was lying when she claimed to know nothing about her husband’s theft of SNP money.
Anyway, there you have it, Mr Ofcom. Complete impartiality giving both sides of this story.
I have my own experience of what a corrupt nasty little country Scotland is. Many years ago, my uncle set up a small electronics manufacturing company in Inverness as he wanted to be near a brother who lived there. My uncle was promised generous grants from the HIDB (Highlands and Islands Development Board) which were keen to encourage manufacturing to move to the North of Scotland. But when the time came to pay out the HIDB grants my uncle was informed that quite a few bribes would have to be paid to the local ‘government mafia’ otherwise no money would be forthcoming.
Anyway, here’s Leo Kearse’s take on the whole sorry Sturgeon affair
Here they are. The two people who (IMHO) are doing the most to help the Manchester Messiah, Andrew ‘I-should-be-PM’ Burnham, win in the Makerfield by-election:
The current polling for the Makerfield by-election is:
LABOUR: 43%
REFORM: 40%
RESTORE: 7%
LIBDEMS: 4%
GREEN: 3%
CONSERVATIVE: 2%
So, the situation is clear. The by-election will be a fight between Labour’s Manchester Messiah, Andrew ‘make-me-pm’ Burnham, and Reform. None of the other parties have any chance of winning. But they can influence the result:
The Nigerian woman
Ms Badenoch – full name before marriage – Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke – should clearly not put up a candidate. The Tories have no chance of winning and may even lose their deposit. But to withdraw her candidate, Olukemi would be admitting that she has failed in her efforts to make the Conservatives electable. And she would also be admitting that Reform, and not the Tories, are the main proponents of conservative, pro-British policies. And that would damage her political career. So, Olukemi has a choice: does she put her own career or her concern for her country first?
It seems to an ignorant fool like myself that Olukemi has made her choice – me, me, me, me and to h*ll with what’s best for Britain!
Mr Rupert Loweand Restore
There seems (to an ignorant fool like myself) to be an awful lot of bad blood between Mr Lowe of ‘Restore’ and Mr Farage of ‘Reform’. I know that a lot of accusations were made about Mr Lowe’s behaviour which we are led to believe was the reason he left Reform. Personally I don’t believe the accusations. If my declining memory serves me correctly, I think the problem between Lowe and Reform arose over Lowe’s proposal that expelling tens of thousands of illegal migrants should form part of Reform’s policies. But other Reform figures – probably Farage, Tice and Yusuf – felt that this would be outside the Overton Window and thus would expose the party to accusations of racism, fascism, Naziism and worse by the UK-hating, Labour-adoring, diversity-worshipping BBC and the rest of the mainstream media. But, of course I may be wrong.
Whatever the reason for the rift between Lowe and Reform, it would seem (to an igniorant fool like myself) that Lowe is facing a similar conundrum to the fragrant Olukemi: does he put his own ego and personal grievances first and stand a candidate in the Makerfield by-election or does he put his concern for his country first and withdraw his candidate to give Reform a better chance of winning?
It seems to an ignorant fool like myself that Mr Lowe has made his choice – me, me, me, me and to h*ll with what’s best for Britain.
But hey, this is just my uninformed personal opinion (so please don’t sue me as I’ve only sold 4 copies of my books this month and so don’t have any money) that the two people doing the most to help the Manchester Messiah win in Makerfield aren’t even from the Labour Party. They are, in fact, the (IMHO) delightful Nigerian Olukemi and the (IMHO) rather angry Mr Lowe.
If I remember correctly, one of the pathetic excuses given by the learned judge for not jailing the enriching repeat rapists was that one of them or all of them or whatever were suffering from the dreaded ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). But it seems that supposed ‘disabilities’ like self-diagnosed ADHD and PSTD and other such ‘horrific’ and ‘debilitating’ mental conditions are being used nowadays as excuses for people – expecilally celebrities, the bone idle and criminals – to avoid the consequences of their actions. For example, don’t many of the BBC’s best-known kiddy-fiddlers claim to be suffering from some made-up mental illness?
Dr Google tells us: ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition that affects how the brain functions, particularly in areas regulating attention, focus, and impulse control. It generally involves persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity that can significantly impact daily functioning, work, and relationships.
An ADHD support website tells us: Common signs of ADHD include:
feeling like you can’t sit still or are fidgety, especially in quiet spaces
talking a lot and interrupting people
finding it hard to focus for a long time
finding it tough to wait your turn
struggling to concentrate or getting distracted easily
people thinking you’re not listening
finding it hard to follow instructions
feeling like you have to always change what you’re doing
finding it tough to make or keep friends
struggling to organise things or forgetting and missing important appointments
I suspect most of us have experienced these supposed ‘symptoms’ of ADHD at some times in our lives.
I don’t watch something called ‘TikTok’. But apparently TikTok is full of videos on how to get an ADHD diagnosis.
Moreover, there are websites offering fast on-line ADHD diagnoses. Here’s one:
Adult ADHD Assessment From £550. NICE Approved, CQC registered. Skip The NHS Waiting List. Fast Online Appointment Within 48Hrs.
45-min diagnostic video evaluation (free extension if additional care is needed)
Comprehensive clinical diagnostic report of assessment findings
All delivered by GMC-registered medical doctors
After that you’re expected to pay a monthly fee of £99.
So, what are you waiting for? You too can get an ADHD or PTSD or whatever mental health diagnosis on-line and then, next time you get into trouble for anything you’ve said or done or if you can’t be arsed to get up in the morning to go to work or if you fancy a nice new car on the government’s motability scheme or you’d quite like a blue disability badge for your car to make parking in your local town centre or at the supermarket easier, you can just go onto TikTok or similar such sites, see how to be diagnosed with a ‘serious’ mental health condition, get your ‘everyone-can-have-one’ disability diagnosis and then wave your mental health ‘get out of jail free’ certificate.
So, don’t delay. It’s time for you to get a ‘mental health’ diagnosis. Everyone else seems to be doing it.
I guess we all knew this already. Gang rape is now legalised in Britain providing you’re a multi-cultural enricher. After all, the extremely enriching grooming (rape) gangs got away with raping orally, vaginally and anally tens of thousands of often under-age white girls while mainly Labour-run councils, Labour-adoring social workers and treacherous UK-hating police looked the other way (or even, in the case of several police officers, reportedly joined in the ‘fun’). And, of course, while in government Starmer’s Labour have tried every dirty trick they can think of to block any inquiry into the the mass rape of white British girls by gangs of enrichers.
But now a judge has confirmed that a hurty tweet can land you in the slammer for up to three years if you’re White British. But two brutal gang rapes by a multi-cultural-enriching gang should not, opined this learned judge, end up with the rapists getting a criminal conviction.
So, there you have it folks. In this case, this judge apparently believes that repeated gang rapes, one lasting about 90 minutes, should not be considered ‘criminal offences’. I can’t recall any incident of repeated gang rape by White British boys or men where the rapists were told they hadn’t committed a criminal act. But it would seem that repeated gang rapes are now legalised if you are an ‘enricher’.
Here’s the (IMHO) excellent, totally unwoke comedian Leo Kearse expressing his outrage at this apparent legalisation of gang rape providing you’re a multi-cultural enricher:
Andy Burnham (like most lefty politicians) has consistently argued that the UK’s current taxation system is unfair because it overtaxes labour while undertaxing wealth and assets, highlighting the lower tax rate on share dividends compared to standard income as a key inequality.
So, we all know what will happen if the ‘King of the North’ becomes our next prime minister.
The first illogical part of the Northern King’s claim is that he somehow forgets to consider the fact that many people who buy shares do so using income which has already been taxed. So, by having to pay tax on their share dividends, they are being taxed twice. And, of course, were they to eventually die while still owning those shares, they will be taxed a third time.
Moreover, if the Burnhamesque economic geniuses believe that taxes on labour (people who can ne bothered to work) are too high compared to other taxes, maybe they should lower income taxes for those who actually work by cutting over-generous benefits for those who can’t be arsed to work? But this idea never seems to occur to them.
Oh, and I just noticed after I wrote this blog that “if you receive social security benefits such as Personal Independence Payment, Carer’s Allowance, or New-Style ESA, your payments will rise by 3.8%”. However, the thresholds at which you pay tax on income or bank interest are still frozen. So, under Britain’s greatest ever female chancellor, those who work are falling further behind those who can’t be arsed to get a job. Is that ‘fair‘?
But there’s a deeper problem with the great economist Burnham’s claim, namely: what is ‘fair’.
Is it fair that those who can be bothered to go out to work have to pay extortionate rates of tax to subsidise the idle lifestyles of the ever-increasing millions who can’t be bothered to get off their fat arses and so prefer to sit at home watching Netflix and Homes Under The Hammer on their widescreen TVs?
Is it fair that around 6 million who do go out to work earn less than many millions of skivers and shirkers who live off our ludicrously over-generous benefits system?
Is it fair that often uneducated, often unemployable, often criminal, often rape-obsessed illegal migrants have a better lifestyle than many millions of British workers who pay taxes to support the invading, West-hating, parasitic Third-worlders?
Is it fair that British workers are suffocated by ever-increasing taxes so that our useless governments can squander billions pouring our money into the offshore bank accounts of utterly corrupt Third-world kleptocrats?
The victim mentality?
When (IMHO) economically-illiterate fools and liars like Andrew ‘f**k-the-bond-markets’ Burnham make these ridiculous statements about what is fair, our journalists never ask any of the above questions. We have become a society in which anyone who tries hard to better themselves and provide a good life for their families is assumed to be an ‘oppressor’ who should be taxed and taxed and taxed in order to pay for the useless, the lazy, the skivers, the shirkers, the parasitic, the worthless, the corrupt, the criminal and all other similar the burdens on society.
Such a society is destined to collapse into despair and bankruptcy.
By the way, have you seen Andrew ‘I’m just a northern working class lad‘ Burnham’s house?
It looks pretty impressive with nice high gates to keep out the working-class riff-raff who paid for the Burnham mansion with their taxes. Is it ‘fair’ that a lifelong public-sector grifter like the Manchester Messiah can afford to live in a mansion at our expense while millions of young people can’t afford to buy their homes? What do you say, Mr Burnham?
Amelia is angry
Having made a few satirical political videos myself, I’m amazed at how quickly British Patriots can make their videos:
David Craig, on June 12th, 2026
