Are these Britain’s “best value” bosses

A couple of days ago, I published a list suggesting which companies were run by Britain’s most overpaid bosses. And I promised to list Britain’s “best value” bosses:

As with the list of Britain’s most overpaid bosses, these figures need to be handled with care. In some instances, CEOs may own large holdings of the companies they run and so seemingly modest remuneration has to be offset by the fact that one day they may cash in their holdings and get tens of millions. Also, further down this list are a few that don’t look logical to me.

(left click on table to see it more clearly)

However, the list does ask the question: How can some “best value” bosses survive on a modest million pounds a year or less while running large successful companies while other (overpaid bosses) need two, three, four million or even more a year while in charge of companies which aren’t doing so well?