David Craig, on October 21st, 2024Monday-Tuesday blog
I don’t attach below a shortish YouTube video from Dr John Campbell. In it he tried to explain the mechanism by which mRNA vaccines may be damaging many people’s health, in particular by accelerating cancer growth.
Campbell is calling for governments to pause mRNA vaccine use and developments until medical trials can confirm whether the mRNA technology is safe.
Of course, this won’t happen for both political and economic reasons:
Political issues
It would be disastrous for the ruling elites if it was found that the mRNA technology is potentially harmful to human health. There would be widespread fury if people found out that they had been bullied, and in some cases forced, to take mRNA vaccines at the risk of losing their jobs or being unable to travel if they refused. For example, in the UK (if I remember correctly) close to 40,000 care workers lost their jobs by refusing the ‘vaccine’. But when bleating about the UK ‘social care crisis’, which our rulers use as an excuse to increase Third-World immigration, our rulers conveniently ‘forget’ that it was their vaccine mandates which are largely responsible for the lack of staff in the social care sector.
Economic issues
Our rulers believe that mRNA technology will be the future for rapid development of vaccines. And the British, Canadian and Australian governments have done deals with Moderna to set up mRNA vaccine manufacturing plants in those three countries. All three countries have seen massive de-industrialisation and outsourcing of their manufacturing to China due to their imbecilic, supposedly planet-saving Net Zero policies:
So these governments are desperate to show that they can create economic growth by ‘investing in the industries of the future’. And one of these ‘industries of the future’ is pharma. Hence the enthusiasm of these countries’ rulers to throw tens of millions of our money at companies like mRNA Moderna. It would be more than embarrassing for our elites if it was shown that mRNA technology was a busted flush. So the elites cannot allow this to happen, however much harm mRNA vaccines actually cause to those being vaccinated. Anyway, it will take years for those harms to be identified and proven and by that time those who promoted the mRNA products will have long since retired with their massive fortunes and pensions. So the mRNA gravy train will continue however many indications there are that this is leading to a medical disaster.
I wanted to attach Dr Campbell’s video, but it seems to have been taken down. Instead here’s another video in which he briefly (in the first 4 minutes) touches on the main problem with the mRNA technology. Though, unfortunately this available video doesn’t give the detailed description of how the mRNA technology may be harming us. But even this short piece may help you judge for yourself if you fancy becoming an mRNA experimental pin cushion:
Category: 
I saw his video on FB talking about it changing dna, this bloke was a major pusher and labelled us as conspiracy theorists, but he has gone thru the lie and found tbe truth and is vocal for us now, fair play to him. As for mRNA , it will be in all vaccines before long and in the food chain. Our food chain, not the elites food chain. Yes, ban it, ban fluoride, ban rhubarb while we,’re at it.
As you know I am not a fan of Campbell because he was heavily promoting the vaccines when they were introduced. Perhaps he is making up for it now, but really all he is doing is repeating what other people have discovered and it is all on the internet.
When the mRNA vaccines were discussed I was immediately concerned because there had been no successful vaccine mRNA approved prior to this. My understanding is that Moderna was set up to develop mRNA technology for cancer treatment and had failed to develop any successful treatment and so moved into vaccines. Moderna was linked with work at the University of North Carolina and they were linked with Wuhan. Will we every know the truth of how these vaccines were developed?
However, I did know a little about the randomised control trials needed for all health treatments and the fist thing I did was get the published trial results from Moderna and Pfizer. I don’t have anything for AstraZeneca. They were published before the vaccines were given emergency approval. There was no indication that they were effective and the trial length was completely inadequate to provide any assessment of the risks. With all drugs it is vital to compare the benefit with the risk. At the time I saw many views saying that the usual rules that applied to vaccine development were ignored, which would have meant the devlopment should have been stopped because the benefits were so poor, even without knowing about the risks. The 95% efficacy was the relative risk reduction expressed as a percentage to create a high percentage deliberately to deceive people into believing it was effective. The clue is the term “relative”. Relative to what and that is the risk of those in the control group who were not vaccinated. The trials were so bad that it was not even clear what the specific risk was, but assuming the risk was of infection, the risk to the unvaccinated was around 1-2%, so the 95% reduced a very small risk.
The number of people on the trials was very low and I think it was a Moderna executive who was questioned about this and his response was that trials involving the number of people needed to give reliable data were too expensive.
It is my opinion that vaccines for respiratory transmitted viruses are not worth while. The virus sits in the mucus membrane for about a week before it moves to the blood system and contacts the vaccine. By that time the worst of the infection is over. The flu vaccines are also of little benefit. Fauci co-authored a paper published in January 2023 “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses” available on the internet which explains this. It did not cover the risks of vaccinations.
I am also starting to question the theory of virology and the existence of viruses. There are an increasing number of articles about this. I am certainly not going to have another vaccine for anything. In the case of the SARS-CoV-2 virus there does not seem to be any organisation that admits to having an isolated sample of the virus after endless FOI requests. How did they test the vaccine before human trials if they did not have a sample of the virus?
Tomsk is also correct that the mRNA vaccines will be used on animals and could enter the food chain. I also agree about fluoride – it should not be put in the water.
But it is not only the above that should concern us. I have read that microplastics have been found in brains and sperm. There is also increasing concern about radiation from phone masts.
Health and climate are both linked because there are experts who know the truth and they are being silenced. You also mention the bulling to take vaccines with threat of job losses.
These are all serious issues which the majority in my fail to see. But what do we do about it?
There is an interesting article on Mises.org “Why It�s Not Enough to Hate the State”. It discusses how governments have limited the influence of organisations which can act against them, for example families which increasing use the state for support, and the church. But also in relation to health they have lost control of the regulator who now seem to be controlled by the organisations they are regulating. I link this back to the stated objectives of the Frankfurt School of Philosophy. An organisation dedicated to using propaganda to destroy civilised society.
You still have a lot of work to do. Don’t stop.
One other angle on this is Rasheed Sanook who was a partner in the vc firm who seed funded moderna. He still has a stake in the business as far as i am aware via the vc partnership but that is held in a blind trust for now.
So a seed investor of Moderna suddenly becomes PM and goes about approving plants and contracts for Moderna. Incredible.
That same PM then calls a suicidal early election against all advice and data. Loses to WEF stooges and drops out of the limelight apparently to return to the USA. In some lights this could be seen to be rather dodgy but hopefully the honourable ladies and gentlemen are just doing their best for us.