Are we really all Klu Klux Klan racists?

Wednesday – Friday blog

Are we really all rabid racists?

I have been slightly perturbed by the reaction of the media and politicians to the pathetic performance of the English football team against Italy last Sunday. In fact, almost nobody mentioned the lacklustre wandering around the pitch by the English football team. Instead, in the mainstream media there was a massive concerted assault on us accusing us all of being racists and accusing the English of being institutionally racist.

As far as I understand, about 30 million people watched the English football team’s third-rate performance. Of these 30 million, about 1,000 on Twitter and perhaps another 1,000 on Instagram and Facebook and other such social media sewers made derogatory and possibly racially-motivated comments about the failure of some coloured footballers to kick a ball into a goal from 12 yards away even when the Italian goalkeeper left the goal wide open by going the wrong way.

I ain’t no mathematical genius, but let’s say that there were around 3,000 allegedly ‘racist’ comments on the social media sewer. That means around 0.01% of those who watched the game made allegedly ‘racist’ comments about certain players. Then, that also means around 99.99% of viewers didn’t make any allegedly ‘racist’ comments. Moreover, many of the supposedly ‘racist’ comments seem to have come from people living outside the UK.

Yet since Sunday’s game, scores of supposed ‘opinion leaders’ and politicians have been appearing on TV and in the press claiming that England is a racist country and that the majority of us are racists.

Of course, the allegation that the majority of us are racists is complete rubbish. But as public debate has been hijacked by those who hate Britain, hate the West, hate the fact that white people are responsible for almost all human progress, hate democracy and hate anyone who doesn’t share their opinions, these people will exploit any opportunity to foment division and conflict to damage our civilisation and hand power over to them.

Multi-millionaire failure Southgate owes fans an explanation

England’s £60,000-a-week man

I believe that the English manager, Gareth ‘muti-millionaire’ Southgate earns gets paid about £3 million a year. That’s about £60,000 a week. I realise that Mr Southgate is some kind of footballer and not an economist. So, it’s possible that Mr Southgate doesn’t understand that the £60,000 a week that pours so effortlessly into his bank account comes from football fans, many of whom don’t get paid £60,000 a week. In fact, many of these fans don’t get paid £60,000 a year. In fact, many of these fans would have to work for 2 to 3 years to get the £60,000 that Mr Southgate reportedly gets every single week.

Did Southgate ‘play the victim card’?

As soon as England lost the game on Sunday, Southgate seemed to me to do what all celebs seem to do nowadays – ‘play the victim card’. Rather than manning up and giving England’s millions of fans an explanation for the dreadful performance of the English team, Southgate made some comment like “it feels like my stomach’s been ripped out”. Was he trying to shift blame from himself by portraying himself as a victim of cruel fate rather than his own incompetence? Does that mean we should feel sorry for him? Does that mean he should not be criticised?

Gareth – How about being a man and explaining the following?

I don’t care who won or lost this unimportant football game in a second-rate competition. But I do believe that, if £60,000-a-week Southgate had been a real man, he should have explained the following to the fans who pay his generous £3m-a-year salary:

• after stunning the Italians with their first goal, why did the English team fall back into defensive play rather than trying to score a second, morale-destroying goal while the Italians were discombobulated?
• why did Southgate not change things at half time to push England into attacking?
• at around 15 minutes into the second half, it was clear that the English team was getting nowhere. Why didn’t Southgate shake things up by putting on a couple of fresh players?
• when the game went into extra time, why didn’t Southgate put some new energy into the team with a couple of substitutes?
• given that the Italian goalkeeper was huge and effective, it should have been obvious that England would lose if the game went to penalties. So why didn’t Southgate push the English team into constant attack in extra time rather than the English team hiding trembling in their own half just trying to survive?
• did Southgate choose the penalty-takers based on the likelihood of them scoring? Or did he choose them on ‘woke’ grounds of their skin colour?
• why did Southgate even bother turning up for the game given that he seemed (IMHO) paralysed by fear and wokeness and contributed less than nothing to the team’s performance?

But English fans, who pay Southgate’s generous £3m-a-year salary, will probably never get any answers to these legitimate questions. Instead, English fans will be insulted and excoriated by our sporting, media and political elites for supposedly being ignorant, violent, reprehensible, worth-than-scum racists.

Truly the once civilised West has lost its confidence and its mind and is intent on committing suicide.

Here’s Paul Joseph Watson commenting on Mr Southgate’s woke English footballing flops: